Cited by

408, 409 (Minn. 1937) (“Objection to the admission of evidence must be taken at the time the evidence is offered.”); (“[W]hen allegedly improper or prejudicial evidence has been admitted without objection, a party may not object to its admissibility for the first time in a motion for a new trial or on appeal.” (quotation omitted)).

The efforts “must be aimed at alleviating the conditions that gave rise to out-of - 8 home placement, and they must conform to the problems presented.”

The efforts “must be aimed at alleviating the conditions that gave rise to out- of-home placement, and they must conform to the problems presented.”

Id.; Gardner v. Comm’r of Pub.

“A parent’s failure to comply with a reasonable case plan results in a presumption that the parent has failed to correct the conditions leading to out-of-home placement.”

“Reasonable efforts encompass more than just a case plan.”

10 that gave rise to out -of-home placement, and they must conform to the problems presented.”

On review of a district court’s best-interests analysis, “we give considerable deference to the district court’s findings.”

Reasonable efforts “must be aimed at alleviating the conditions that gave rise to out- of-home placement, and they must conform to the problems presented.”

“A finding is clearly erroneous if it is manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” (quotation omitted).

A reviewing court “needs only one properly supported statutory ground in order to affirm a termination order.”

The efforts “must be aimed at alleviating the conditions that gave rise to out -of-home placement, and they must conform to the problems presented.”

“Reasonable efforts encompass more than just a case plan.”

“Competing interests include health considerations, a stable environment, and the child’s preference.”

The efforts “must be aimed at alleviating the conditions that gave rise to out-of-home placement, and they must conform to the problems presented.”

(citations and quotations omitted).

“Reasonable efforts encompass more than just a case plan.” We review a district court’s findings identifying the efforts the county made to reunify a family for clear error.

On appellate review of a district court’s best-interests analysis, “we give considerable deference to the district court’s findings.” , 477 (Minn. App. 2000) (“[C]urrent law leaves scant if any room for an appellate court to question the trial court’s balancing of best-interests considerations.”).

When reviewing a district court’s determination regarding whether to terminate parental rights, “we review the factual findings for clear error.”

“Because the best-interests analysis involves credibility determinations and is generally not susceptible to an appellate court’s global review of a record, we give considerable deference to the district court’s findings.” (quotation omitted).

rev. denied (Minn. May 12, 2021); (stating that we review the district court’s factual findings for clear error).

To terminate parental rights on this ground, “[t]he [district] court must find that at the time of termination, the parent is not presently able and willing to assume [her] responsibilities and that the parent’s neglect of these duties will continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period.” (quotations omitted).

“Reasonable efforts encompass more than just a case plan.”

[Appellate courts] must closely inquire into the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether it was clear and convincing.” (citation and quotation omitted).

Minn. Stat. § 260C.301, subd.

1(b)(2), and the neglect of those duties must be found to “continue for a prolonged, indeterminate period,” (quotation omitted).

of J.K.T., (applying rule 803(6) to medical records).

[Appellate courts] must closely inquire into the sufficiency of the evidence to determine whether it was clear and convincing.” (quotations and citations omitted).

When a district court concludes that a provision under subdivision 1(b) justifies termination, it 12 “must make clear and specific findings conforming to the statutory requirements, and the evidence must address conditions that exist at the time of the hearing.” (quotation omitted).

6 DECISION Parental rights may be terminated only for “grave and weighty reasons.”

“[F]ailure to complete the case plan amounts to a failure to correct the conditions leading to out-of-home placement.”

(recognizing that a reviewing court “need[s] only one properly supported statutory ground in order to affirm a termination order”).

And “[a] parent’s failure to comply with a reasonable case plan results in a presumption that the parent has failed to correct the conditions leading to out-of-home placement.”

“But we need only one properly supported statutory ground in order to affirm a termination order.”

“A finding is clearly erroneous if it is manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” (quotation omitted).

rev. denied (Minn. May 12, 2021); (stating that we review the district court’s factual findings for clear error).