Cited by

Rutland argues that the district court’s decision not to grant a dispositional departure was an abuse of discretion because it was “against logic and the facts in the record .”

“ A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” State v. Guzman

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion 10 when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an “erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

d 801, 812-13 (Minn. 2017) (“When an alleged evidentiary error is harmless, an appellate court need not address the merits of the claimed error.” (quotation omitted)).

“ A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

A district court abuses its discretion when its ruling is “based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion 10 when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” , 810 (Minn. 2017).

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an “erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” ().

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” ().

On review, we “read the relevant jury instructions as a whole to determine if they accurately describe the law.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic 6 and the facts in the record.”

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” ().

“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”

A defendant “must comply with established rules of procedure and evidence.”

(Minn. 10 Valdez’s stepbrother, the person in peril, also testified that he could have retreated when Gutierrez initially attacked him—a point in time before Gutierrez tackled the stepbrother and Valdez used of force.