Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Guzman, 892 N.W.2d 801.

166 citing documents.

Hennepin County State of Minnesota v. Derrick Lamon Johnson Moore, III, J Minn. 2026
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Gene Stensrud Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Qalinle Ibrahim Dirie Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an “erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Liban Dahir Mohamed Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Kelsey Marie Rutland Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Rutland argues that the district court’s decision not to grant a dispositional departure was an abuse of discretion because it was “against logic and the facts in the record .”
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Josef Brenner Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Christian Dior Byrd Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“ A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Adam Taylor Fravel Minn. 2026
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Richard Speten Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” State v. Guzman
State of Minnesota v. Sharon Ann Schmalzriedt Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Michael Tillman Minn. 2026
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Pierre Omar Combs Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A district court abuses its discretion 10 when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Dhara Hayi Hassan Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. David Bernard Suess, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. William Louis Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. William Louis Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2026
A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an “erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
Juan Pachuco Silva v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 801, 812-13 (Minn. 2017) (“When an alleged evidentiary error is harmless, an appellate court need not address the merits of the claimed error.” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota v. Deandre Washington Leroy Craig Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“ A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Lamechtric Irving Beasley Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Jamaal Terrance Tanna Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Anthony James Cox Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court abuses its discretion when its ruling is “based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Ahmed Mohamed Hassan Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion 10 when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Edward James Lafore, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Edward James Lafore, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. James Earl Bailey Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” , 810 (Minn. 2017).
State of Minnesota v. Pharoah Gerald Ashley Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Vick Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lee Vick Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Chad David Doris Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. James Garlen Wininngham Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Brandon Capone Williams-Gillard Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an “erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. James Demetrius Redd Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Franklin Pierce Barnes Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Ernest Marshall Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” ().
State of Minnesota v. Jill Diane Tucker Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. J. P., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Amal Mohamed Osman Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Norton Engel Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Norton Engel Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Gabriel Macedo Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Michael Eugene Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” ().
State of Minnesota v. Lamarquita Gesine Leach Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Mohamed Abdulgani Ahmed Minn. Ct. App. 2024
On review, we “read the relevant jury instructions as a whole to determine if they accurately describe the law.”
State of Minnesota v. Dwayne Edward Roach Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Purna Bahadur Bhujel Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic 6 and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Deandre Dontae Turner Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Deandre Dontae Turner Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” ().
State of Minnesota v. Deondre Demetrius Ramsey Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. David Stephan Herr Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Lee Heller Minn. 2024