Cited by

(stating that appellate courts only consider “issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it”).

(stating new issues may not be raised on appeal).

“[A]ppellate courts generally address only issues presented to and decided by the district court.” n.2 (Minn. App. 2001) ().

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (stating that this court should consider “only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court” and that a party may not “obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory” (quotation omitted)); cf. Annis v. Annis, 84 N

App. P. 110.01 (stating that the appellate record is limited to “documents filed in the trial court, the exhibits, and the transcript of the proceedings, if any”); -83 (Minn. 1988) (stating that “[a]n appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside of the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below”).

(stating that appellate courts “must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it” and that an appellant may not “obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different t

A party cannot raise a new issue on appeal, “[n]or may a party obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory.”

(stating that appellate courts do not consider issues not “presented [to ] and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it” and parties cannot “obtain review by raising the same general issue litigated below but under a different theory” (quotation omitted)).

(stating that appellate courts generally do not consider issues not presented to district court).

We first consider whether this argument is properly before us. “A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (quotation omitted); see also Hegseth v. Am.

Because the district court considered the issue, (“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted) (emphasis added)).

(noting that we consider “only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it”).

( in a certiorari appeal).

See In (determining that parent forfeited review of an issue not raised in district court in a TPR proceeding); (stating “[a] reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it” (quotation omitted)).

specified psychosis and ruled out substance-induced psychosis and ruled out medical -related psychosis.” But, based on Dr. Larsen’s testimony about 4 Woodley’s addendum contains an article “Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Criminal Responsibility.” -83 (Minn. 1988) (“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.”).

(noting a reviewing court must generally consider only those issues presented and considered below).

(stating that appellate courts generally do not consider issues not presented to and considered by district court); (declining to address arguments offered without citation to supporting “evidence in the record or relevant legal authority”), re

(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

“A reviewing court generally must consider only those issues that the record 6 shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted).

Generally, appellate courts may consider only issues that were “presented [to] and considered by the [district] court.”

“An appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.” -83 (Minn. 1988).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

This court “may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.” -83 (Minn. 1988).

(explaining that “[a] reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it[,] .

d 580, 582 (Minn. 1988) (“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

See Thiele v. Stich , (“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

See, e.g., Flooring Removal, Inc. v. Ryerson , (holding that this court “erred in identifying and then deciding” issue that “was neither raised nor tried below and was not addressed by the parties on appeal”); (declining to consider issues not presented to and considered by district court).

(stating that appellate courts rarely address questions not previously presented to and considered by the district court).

(“A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were pres ented and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted)).

(stating that appellate courts generally address only those questions previously presented to and considered by the district court).

(holding that this court does not consider material not presented to and considered by the previous decision-maker).

See Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., (stating that “an appellate court may not base its decision on matters outside the record on appeal” or consider “matters not produced and received in evidence below”); (stating that appellate courts generally consider only issues presented to and considered by district court).

Thiele v. Stich , -83 (Minn. 1988).

“ A reviewing court must generally consider only those issues that the record shows were presented [to] and considered by the [district] court in deciding the matter before it.” (quotation omitted); (applying Thiele to an argument not presented to or considered by a ULJ), rev. denied (Minn. June 21, 2022).

(stating that appellate courts generally only consider issues presented to and decided by the district court).

But we “may not base [our] decision on matters outside the record on appeal, and may not consider matters not produced and received in evidence below.” -83 (Minn. 1988).

(stating appellate courts generally must consider “only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court” (quotation omitted)); (applying Thiele in an unemployment-benefits appeal).