Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Dobrin v. Dobrin, 569 N.W.2d 199.

247 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Kevin Max Peterson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. D., Mother Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: John Alex Walker, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Charles Edward Honke, Minn. 2021
uiry, we have said that a “trial court has broad discretion in deciding whether to award maintenance and before an appellate court determines that there has been a clear abuse of that discretion, it must determine that there must be a clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.” ().
In re the Marriage of: Rupam Sinha, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. A. K., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A district court abuses its discretion if it resolves the discretionary question in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.” d 199, 202 (Minn. 1997).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. T. and J. T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(d 199, 202 (Minn. 1997)).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: B. L. W., M. T. L. II, and … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Marcia A. Hammond, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Ajay K. Israni, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. D. S., Commissioner of Human Services, Legal … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 573, 578 (Minn. App. 2010) (applying this aspect of Dobrin in an adoption appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dobrin v. Dobrin , & n.3 (Minn. 1997) ().
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Perrill, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Kimberly JoAnn Wauzynski, n/k/a/ Kimberly JoAnn Denne, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
10, 2020) (quotation omitted); see Dobrin v. Dobrin
In re the Marriage of: Jane Swenson Amdal, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“Implicit in Minn. Stat. § 518.552 is that the spouse seeking maintenance must demonstrate the need [for it] .
In re the Marriage of: Edith Ponciano, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Kristine Ann Spratt Hansen, n/k/a Kristine Ann Spratt, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: James Warren Huerd, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dobrin v. Dobrin , & n.3 (Minn. 1997) (citing Sefkow v. Sefkow , ).
In re the Marriage of: Charles Robert Aufenthie, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Joseph Parnell, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Herman Goldenberg, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Richard T. Hudgins, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 199, 202 & n.3 (Minn. 1997) ().
In the Matter of the Application of Debora Lee Neu, Brian Joseph Neu for a Change of Name … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Larry Allan Keeler, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Mary Elizabeth Moline, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dobrin v. Dobrin , rev’d on other grounds
In re the Marriage of: Marcia A. Hammond, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Adam C. Steele, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: James Richard Huntsman, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dobrin v. Dobrin , & n.3 (Minn. 1997) (citation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Sheila L. Duhn, n/k/a Graff, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Lauri Sue Browning, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dobrin v. Dobrin , d 199, 202 (Minn. 1997).
Ripley Karen Bresson, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Curtis Glenn Marks, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court “has broad discretion in deciding whether to award maintenance,” as well as in determining the amount and duration of any maintenance awarded
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Anne Sanders, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Mark Allen Kedrowski, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. F. and J. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dobrin v. Dobrin , , 202 (Minn. 1997).
In re the Marriage of: Casey Alena Holloway, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Joseph Parnell, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court abuses its discretion if it resolves a maintenance issue in a manner that is “against logic and the facts on the record,” , misapplies the law, or makes findings of fact that are unsupported by the record , d 199, 202 (Minn. 1997).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dobrin v. Dobrin , & n.3 (Minn. 199 7).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2018
& n.3 (Minn. 1997) (d 203, 210 (Minn. 1988)).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(“[A]s a general rule, an ap pellate court 6 decision on a particular issue establishes the law of the case, not subject to reexamination on a second appeal of the same case.” (quotation omitted)); see also State ex rel.