DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Dobrin v. Dobrin, 569 N.W.2d 199.

248 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Katherine Ann Reichert v. Matthew Alan Born, County of Dakota, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Kevin Max Peterson v. Rebecca Jane Peterson, County of Dakota, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. D., Mother Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: John Alex Walker v. Laura Margaret Walker Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Charles Edward Honke v. Jennifer Hodapp Honke Minn. 2021
uiry, we have said that a “trial court has broad discretion in deciding whether to award maintenance and before an appellate court determines that there has been a clear abuse of that discretion, it must determine that there must be a clearly erroneous conclusion that is against logic and the facts on record.” ().
In re the Marriage of: Rupam Sinha v. Deepak Kademani Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. A. K., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A district court abuses its discretion if it resolves the discretionary question in a manner “that is against logic and the facts on record.” d 199, 202 (Minn. 1997).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. T. and J. T., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(d 199, 202 (Minn. 1997)).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: B. L. W., M. T. L. II, and … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Marcia A. Hammond v. Jeffrey Lyle Buchanan Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Ajay K. Israni v. Sonal A. Sidhwani Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. D. S., Commissioner of Human Services, Legal … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
d 573, 578 (Minn. App. 2010) (applying this aspect of Dobrin in an adoption appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Caryn Blaine Evans v. Keith Eric Evans Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: Andrew Lowe Billett v. RuthAnne Billett Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dobrin v. Dobrin , & n.3 (Minn. 1997) ().
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Perrill v. Gregory High Perrill Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Kimberly JoAnn Wauzynski, n/k/a/ Kimberly JoAnn Denne v. John Justin Wauzynski Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Matthew James Ulness v. Jill Marie Ulness, n/k/a Jill-Marie Stefano Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Timothy John Goettl v. Tonna Lorraine Goettl Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Lisa Marie Kent v. Brenton Jackson Kent Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the marriage of: Aaron Peterson v. Brandi Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2020
10, 2020) (quotation omitted); see Dobrin v. Dobrin
In re the Marriage of: Jane Swenson Amdal v. Keith Solomon Moheban Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“Implicit in Minn. Stat. § 518.552 is that the spouse seeking maintenance must demonstrate the need [for it] .
In re the Marriage of: Edith Ponciano v. Felix Murillo Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Kristine Ann Spratt Hansen, n/k/a Kristine Ann Spratt v. Christopher Patrick Hansen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: James Warren Huerd v. Wanda Sue Huerd Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Dobrin v. Dobrin , & n.3 (Minn. 1997) (citing Sefkow v. Sefkow , ).
In re the Marriage of: Charles Robert Aufenthie v. Heidi Christine Aufenthie Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Joseph Parnell v. Christine Melanie Parnell Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Jeffrey Herman Goldenberg v. Karen Lisa Yashar Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Richard T. Hudgins v. Margaret Foster Hudgins Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Paul Matthias Hobday v. Mary Kay Hobday Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Christina L. Suhsen v. Karl W. Suhsen Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 199, 202 & n.3 (Minn. 1997) ().
In the Matter of the Application of Debora Lee Neu, Brian Joseph Neu for a Change of Name … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Peder Kristian Rogich v. Denise Lynn Rogich Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Larry Allan Keeler v. Michelle Marie Keeler Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Mary Elizabeth Moline v. Daniel Robert Moline Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dobrin v. Dobrin , rev’d on other grounds
In re the Marriage of: Marcia A. Hammond v. Jeffrey Lyle Buchanan Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Adam C. Steele v. Sarah M. Held Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: James Richard Huntsman v. Zenith Annette Huntsman Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dobrin v. Dobrin , & n.3 (Minn. 1997) (citation omitted).
In re the Marriage of: Sheila L. Duhn, n/k/a Graff v. Kurt D. Duhn Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Lauri Sue Browning v. Daniel H. Gruenstein Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dobrin v. Dobrin , d 199, 202 (Minn. 1997).
Ripley Karen Bresson v. Jason James Ourada Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Curtis Glenn Marks v. Stacy Rene Marks Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court “has broad discretion in deciding whether to award maintenance,” as well as in determining the amount and duration of any maintenance awarded
In re the Marriage of: Nicole Marie Anne Sanders v. Joseph James Sanders Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Mark Allen Kedrowski v. Masako Kedrowski Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. F. and J. B., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Dobrin v. Dobrin , , 202 (Minn. 1997).
In re the Marriage of: Casey Alena Holloway v. Kent Bradford Holloway Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Joseph Parnell v. Christine Melanie Parnell Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A district court abuses its discretion if it resolves a maintenance issue in a manner that is “against logic and the facts on the record,” , misapplies the law, or makes findings of fact that are unsupported by the record , d 199, 202 (Minn. 1997).
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas James Davis v. Theresa Anne Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Dobrin v. Dobrin , & n.3 (Minn. 199 7).
In re the Marriage of: Laura Diane Hermer v. Lawrence James Cisek, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
& n.3 (Minn. 1997) (d 203, 210 (Minn. 1988)).