Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of L.A.F., 554 N.W.2d 393.

204 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: H. R. and B. R. (deceased), Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. J. C., M. S. H., II, and … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. R. K., J. J. A., and Any … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
We give “[c]onsiderable deference” to th e district court’s decision to terminate parental rights “because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. R. W., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In Re the Custody of: S.K.T.S: Sharon D. Oglesby, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
if the parent has actually deserted the child and has an intention to forsake the duties of parenthood”) (quotation omitted); (stating, in a termination-of-parental-rights appeal, that abandonment was established where father failed to avail himself of rights to child, he lp with child-rearing expenses, or contact the child because absence was intentional rather “than due to misfortune and misconduct alone”) (quotation
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: H.G.D. and J.R.Q., Parents. Minn. 2021
While we will “closely inquire” into the sufficiency of the evidence, we also defer to the district court, which “is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
A21-0050 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
8 Minn. Stat. § 260C.301 (2020); -97 (Minn. 1996).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. B. and C. J. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
We give considerable deference to the district court’s credibility determinations because “a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. M. C., K. W. C. and T. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because 18 a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. J. O., J. E. J., and J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
However, the district court is “in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. M., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. M. C. and C. L. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. E. S., M. W. C., and T. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J.C. L. and J. H. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. O., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
On appeal, “[c] onsiderable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. C. and J. J. A. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“To involuntarily terminate parental rights, the district court must find that at least one of the eight statutory conditions for termination exist[s].” Minn. Stat. § 260C.301, subd.
A20-1307 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: Y. F., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of: Holly Elizabeth Often, o/b/o Minor Children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A20-0065 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. R. D., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
D E C I S I O N “To involuntarily terminate parental rights, the district cour t must find that at least one of the eight statutory conditions for termination exist[s].”
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. A., D. M., and G. T., … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 393, 396 (Minn. 1996) (“[A] district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”); see also In re Welfare of J.H.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. T. and T. Z., Sr., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
On appeal, “[c]onsiderable deference is due to the district court’s decisi on because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. D. T. and J. M. O., … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
On review, “[c]onsiderable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to a ssess the credibility of witnesses.”
In re the Matter of the Children of: L.N.L. and S.J.R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1(b) (2018); (“To involuntarily terminate parental rights, the district court must find that at least one of the eight statutory conditions for termination exist.”).
A19-1051 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K.H. and D.C., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
On appeal, “[c]onsiderable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: V. N. M. and C. W. N., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. R. A. and J. M. K., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
remain the paramount consideration in every termination case.” d 393, 397 (Minn. 1996) (quotation omitted); see also M.D.O., d at 375.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. E. K. and K. M. M., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. H. and J. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: H.W.-S. and D.T.W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Amy Alyssa Post, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. E. J. and M. D. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s [TPR] decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”).
Patrick Hugh Stack, et al., petitioners, Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Constans v. Comm’r of Pub.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. M. P. and A. S. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. R. T. and P. B. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Welfare of: D. V.-L., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 393, 396 (Minn. 1996).
, A18-1041 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re 911 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2018
In re 911 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2018
396 (Minn. 1996) ("Considerable deference is due to the district court's decision [to terminate parental rights] because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses."); see also In re the Welfare of J.H.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. M. P. and L. R. D., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
We give “considerable deference” to the district court’s decision in terminating parental rights “because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
A17-1336 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(stating that it is not the appellate court’s function to reweigh evidence, find facts, or as sess credibility); (giving the district court’s credibility determinations deference in the juvenile protection context).
A17-1514 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(stating that this court gives 11 considerable deference to the district court’s decision to terminate a person’s parental rights because the “district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses”).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. P. T. and S. B. I. T., … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A reviewing court defers to the district court’s credibility determinations because it is in a “superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. H., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
And “[c]onsiderable deference is due to the district court’s decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. K., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
We will give considerable defere nce to the district court’s decision to terminate a person’s parental rights because the “district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.” 396 (Minn. 1996).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. J. Z. M and S. M. M., … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. M. K. and J. Z. J., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See In re Welfare of 11 L.A.F., (“Considerable deference is due to the district court’s [TPR] decision because a district court is in a superior position to assess the credibility of witnesses.”).