Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. George, 557 N.W.2d 575.

248 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Vanessa Lynn Page Minn. Ct. App. 2021
R e s p o n d e n t , Minn. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Levar Randolph Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. George , (providing that an officer has an objective basis for stopping a vehicle if the officer “observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant”).
State of Minnesota v. Robert Orville Huhnerkoch Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[I]f an officer observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant, the officer has an objective basis for stopping the vehicle.”
State of Minnesota v. Donn Richard Ganske Minn. Ct. App. 2020
has an objective basis for stopping the vehicle.” State v. George
State of Minnesota v. Irwin James Sam Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“If an officer observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant, the officer has an objective basis for stopping the vehicle.” .
Kevin Nelson Birkland v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Anderson , -79 (Minn. 1997).
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Robert Richard Rousu Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Devon Dennis Carstensen Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Jesse William Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. William Joseph Ihrke Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Brian Dale Preston Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Jarvis Michael Cunningham Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Erik Heiderscheid Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Zong Lee Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. George , (stating that an observed traffic violation justifies a stop).
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Jon Mugge Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Ordinarily, if an officer observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant, the officer has an objective basis for stopping the vehicle.” d 575, 578 (Minn. 1997).
State of Minnesota v. Willie Alonso Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2019
[his] vehicle was justified at its inception because Officer Spencer observed [him] speeding” and that “Spencer expanded the scope and duration of the stop beyond its original purpose when he seized Smith not for the purpose of investigating the speeding but for the purpose of investigating his ‘very suspicious’ behavior after he pulled into and parked in the driveway.” d 575, 578 (Minn. 1997) (“[I]f an officer observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant, the officer has an obje
State of Minnesota v. Cornelius Palmer Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“Ordinarily, if an officer observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant, the officer has an objective basis for stopping the vehicle.”).
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Alvin Peterson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Adam Lindsay Williams v. Commissioner of Public Safety (A18-0970), State of Minnesota (A18-1103), vs. Adam Lindsay Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Paul Vang Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Allen Giles Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Eric Jon Prochnow Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Ordinarily, if an officer observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant, the officer has an objective basis for stopping the vehicle.” d 575, 578 (Minn. 1997).
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Owen Kelley Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Phillip Joseph Porter Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that “if an officer observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant, the officer has an objective basis for stopping the vehicle”).
State of Minnesota v. Eddy Robert Oman Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Scott Blahowski Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(citing State v. Pleas , , 333 -34 (Minn. 1983) (upholding stop based on officer’s observation of broken windshield, no front license plate, and rear plate upside down); State 5 v. Barber, (upholding stop based on officer’s observation that license pla
State of Minnesota v. Somboon Lor Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Ordinarily, if police observe a traffic violation, “however insignificant, the officer has an objective basis for stopping the vehicle.”
State of Minnesota v. David James Fineday Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The state argues that the initia l stop was supported by reason able, articulable suspicion because the police offi cer testified that Fineday had a broken taillight and malfunctioning license plate equipment.
State of Minnesota v. Zach Wallace Larson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A traffic stop “must be justified by some objective manifestation that the person stopped is, or is about to be, engaged in criminal activity.” d 575, 578 (Minn. 1997) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ashley Amy Schwartz Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A traffic stop “must be justified by some objective manifestation that the person stopped is, or is about to be, engaged in criminal activity .” d 575, 578 (Minn. 1997) (quotation omitted).
Cole Gilbert McGuire v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. John Duane Fairbanks Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Philip George Kruse v. Commissioner of Public Safety (A17-0552), and State of Minnesota (A17-0564), vs. Philip George Kruse Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A traffic stop “‘must be justified by some objective manifestation that the person stopped is, or is about to be, engaged in criminal activity.’” d 575, 578 (Minn. 1997) (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417, 101 S. Ct. 690, 695 (1981)).
State of Minnesota v. Alex William Rosa Minn. Ct. App. 2017
And though an officer has every right to ask for permission to search
State of Minnesota v. Jose Luis Ramirez Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Paul Alan Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Ordinarily, if an officer observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant, the officer has an objective basis for stopping the vehicle.”
State of Minnesota v. Mai Tria Xiong Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Blane Hughes Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Eddie Morris Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. George , see also Berge v. Commissioner of Pub.
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Eugene Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Joshua Alvin Peterson v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2017
William Robert Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2017
see also B erge v. Commissioner of Pub .
State of Minnesota v. Johnnie Robert Capers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Johnnie Robert Capers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Minn. Stat. § 169.19, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Paul Harvey McGee Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Paul Harvey McGee Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[I]f an officer observes a violation of a traffic law, however insignificant, the officer has an objective basis for stopping the vehicle.” d 575, 578 (Minn. 1997).
State of Minnesota v. Steven Duane Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Steven Duane Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2016

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by