Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State of Minnesota v. Kevin Trent Johnson, 867 N.W.2d 210.

75 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“A factual basis exists if there are sufficient facts on the record to support a conclusion that defendant’s conduct falls within the charge to which he desires to plead guilty.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Marvel Galvaston Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Marvel Galvaston Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-15 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
A23-0027 State of Minnesota v. Eric Dow Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A23-0027 State of Minnesota v. Eric Dow Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating a defendant is free 5 to appeal from a judgment of conviction and argue that the record at the time of the plea was inadequate); (), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Ali Dayib Warsame Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Ali Dayib Warsame Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
This agreement and a strong factual basis “provide the court with a basis to independently conclude that there is a strong probability that the defendant would be found guilty of the charge to which he pleaded guilty, notwithstanding his claims of innocence.” Id.; see also Ecker, d at 716-17; -17 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-15 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- 15 (Minn. App. 2015) (applying de novo review in determ ining validity of guilty plea challenged on direct appeal).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See State v. Johnson , -15 (Minn. App. 2015) (reviewing de novo th e accuracy of appellant’s guilty plea, which appellant challenged for the first time on direct appeal), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“If a guilty plea fails to meet any of these three requirements, the plea is invalid.” State v. Johnson , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Johnson , -15 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-15 (Minn. App. 2015), 4 review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“If a guilty plea fails to meet any of these three requirements, the plea is invalid.” State v. Johnson , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Johnson , -15 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Nyla Tomeka Murrell-French, Appellant. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A guilty plea is inaccurate if it is not supported by a proper factual basis.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Brown v. 5 State, -83 (Minn. 1989); State v. Johnson , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
.”); (considering appellant’s challenge to the accuracy requirement of his guilty plea even though he did not present it to the district court), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(“A defendant enters a Norgaard plea if he claims a loss of memory, through amnesia or intoxication, regarding the circumstances of the offense but the record establishes the defendant is guilty or likely to be conviction of the crime charged.” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 210, 217 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(“A defendant is free to simply appeal directly from a judgment of conviction and contend that the record made at the time of the plea was entered is inadequate in one or more of these respects [i.e., that the plea was not valid because it was not accurate, voluntary, or intelligent].”); review denied (Minn. Sept.
Malik Jordan Olsen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
This agreement and a strong factual basis “provide the court with a basis to independently conclude that there is a strong probability that the defendant would be found guilty of the charge to which he pleaded guilty, notwithstanding his claims of innocence.” Id.; Ecker, d at 716-17; -17 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Johnny Hernandez Perez, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
You have continued to blame [the victim] and for 1 “A defendant enters an Alford/Goulette plea if he maintains his innocence but ‘reasonably believes, and the record establishes, the state has sufficie nt evidence to obtain a conviction.’” ( (citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37, 91 S. Ct. 160, 167 (1970)), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
At the plea hearing, appellant 1 In a Norgaard plea, the defendant enters a plea of guilty but “claims a loss of memory, through amnesia or intoxication, regarding the circumstances of the offense but the record establishes that the defendant is guilty or likely to be convicted of the crime charged.” (Minn .
Ronnie Bila Shaka, Petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-15 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Johnson , review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Brown v. State , 5 review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Johnson , –15 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1 State v. Johnson , -15 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
2 A Norgaard plea is one in which the defendant “claims a loss of memory, th rough amnesia or intoxication, regarding the circumstances of the off ense,” but pleads guilty because “the record establishes that the defendant is guilty or likely to be convicted of the crime charged.” State v. Johnson , (quotations omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1 A Norgaard plea refers to a plea where the defendant enters a plea but “claims a loss of memory, through amnesia or intoxication, regarding the circumstances of the offense but the record establishes that the defendant is guilty or likely to be convicted of the crim e charged.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Berkeley Read Lewis, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Johnson , -15 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
crime charged.” State v. Johnson , (quotations omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Jennifer Natalie Bernard, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Id.; d 210, 214-15 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
4 review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Although analyzed in the context of a Norgaard plea, 2 Hendrickson’s argument was rejected by this court in 2 A Norgaard plea is similar to an Alford plea but different in that the defendant’s “inability to admit the allegations in the complaint is due to his lack of recollection” and not due to 10 Johnson, in which this court recognized that a “district court’s obligation is to ‘ensure that an adequate factual ba sis has been established in the record.’” Id.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-15 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The independent conclusion the district court should reach is “m erely that [it] must assure itself that the accuracy standard is satisfied.”
Gideon Charles Arrington, II, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 210, 215 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See, e.g., State v. Johnson , (victim was strangled to the point it affected her vision), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
We rejected this argument in Johnson, although in the context of a Norgaard plea.1 -17 (Minn. App. 2015), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
5 “A guilty plea is inaccurate if it is not supported by a proper factual basis.” review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Sept.