Cited by

“ A finding is clearly erroneous only if there is no reasonable evidence to support the finding or when an appellate court is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake occurred.” (quotation omitted), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

See, -19 (Minn. App. 2015) (reviewing district court’s dismissal of amended permanency petition for abuse of discretion), rev. denied (Minn. July 21 , 2015).

-23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015); J.R.B., d at 899-902.

-22 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

-22 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

See S.E.P., d at 387; -23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015); -902 (Minn. App. 2011), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.

3 (Minn. App. 2015) (“The reasonable-efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion .”), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

(stating that district court’s “reasonable- efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion”), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

(reasonable efforts), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015); J.R.B., d at 905-06 (best interests).

d 315, 321-22 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

-23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

10 -23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015) (concluding that the district court ’s “reasonable-efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion”).

We review a juvenile-protection order’s “factual findings for clear error and its findings of a statutory basis for the order for abuse of discretion.” rev. denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

-23 (Minn. App. 2015) (reasonable efforts); J.R.B., d at 905 (best interests).

-23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

6 DECISION On appeal from an order permanently transferring custody of a child, we review the district court’s “factual findings for clear error and its finding of a statutory basis for the order for an abuse of discretion.” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

We also “review the [district] court’s factual findings for clear error and its finding of a statutory basis for the order for abuse of discretion.” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

(concluding that the district court’s “reasonable -efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion”), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

d 315, 321-23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

(concluding that the district court’s “reasonable-efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion”), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

(concluding that the district court’s “reasonable- efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion”), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

-23 (Minn. App. 2015) (determining that the district court’s “reasonable-efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion”), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

rev. denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

(ruling that the district court’s “reasonable-efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion”), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

We review the district court’s findings of fact regarding reasonable efforts for clear error, J.H., d at 601, and the district court’s determination of whether the reunification efforts were 16 reasonable for an abuse of discretion, rev. denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

Compare -23 (Minn. App. 2015) (reviewing the district court’s reasonable-efforts statutory findings for abuse of discretion and the court’s underlying factual determinations for clear error), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015), with J.H., d at 601 (reviewing the district court’s reasonable-efforts determination

When reviewing an order transferring permanent physical and legal custody through a juvenile-protection proceeding, we review the district court’s factual findings for clear error and the “finding of a statutory basis for the order for abuse of discretion.” rev. denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

See S.E.P., d at 387; –23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015); –902 (Minn. App. 2011), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.

When reviewing an order transferring permanent physical and legal custody through juvenile protection, we review 9 the district court’s factual findings for clear error and the “finding of a statutory basis for the order for abuse of discretion.” rev. denied (Minn. July 21, 2015).

of S.E.P., (reviewing for clear error a district court’s findings on the efforts made); (reviewing for an abuse of discretion a district court’s determination that efforts were reasonable), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

6 -23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015); -902 (Minn. App. 2011), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.

(concluding that the district court’s “reasonable-efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion”), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

- 23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

d 315, 321 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

-22 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

- 23 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

On appeal from an order transferring permanent legal and physical custody of a child, this court “review[s] the [district] court’s factual findings for clear error and its finding of a statutory basis for the order for abuse of discretion.” rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

- 22 (Minn. App. 2015), rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).

(concluding that the district court’s reasonable-efforts finding was not an abuse of discretion).

rev. denied (Minn. July 20, 2015).