Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Raleigh, 778 N.W.2d 90.

864 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Dennis Rioba Nyandiekda Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Meade Terrell Stademeyer Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” State v. Raleigh , d 90, 93 (Minn. 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Quintin Isaiah Bianco Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Douglas Edwin Minor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
State of Minnesota v. Zittie Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
State of Minnesota v. Abram Valdez Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accura te, voluntary, and intelligent.” (M inn.
State of Minnesota v. Arthur Rafie Mullins Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A plea must be accurate to ensure that a defendant does not plead guilty “to a more serious offense than that for which he could be convicted if he insisted on his right to trial.” State v. Raleigh , 4 (Minn. 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Rafael Buenfil Minn. Ct. App. 2020
D E C I S I O N “A defendant has no absolute right to wi thdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
State of Minnesota v. Dustin Alexander Depiano Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Allen Crotty Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Everett Savoy Vaughn v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Teresa Michelle Peterson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Darren Lee Whitelow Minn. Ct. App. 2020
But “a court must allow withdrawal of a guilty plea if withdrawal is necessary to correct a ‘manifest injustice.’” (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Melody Victoria Gray Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Jared Otha Washington Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accura te, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Jessica Lynne Dahlgren Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Rufo Hamid Mumed Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Joe Lavell Smiley Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Trejuan Dominic Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Raleigh , (explaining that a defendant cannot withdraw his plea even if the district court did not obtain proper responses to establish the factual basis when the record contains enough evidence to support the conviction).
State of Minnesota v. Abdifatah Abdullahi Hassan Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Tescil Romalis Mason-Kimmons Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Nyla Tomeka Murrell-French Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
State of Minnesota v. Junting He Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Alan Danny Woods Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Steven Kalland Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Patrick Barnett Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Donald Ray Quin, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Marlin Vosburg Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Vance Diwayne Laster, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Laster contends that the “district court abused its discretion by denying [his] pre - sentencing motion to withdraw his guilty plea.” “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
Donald Lester Milks, III v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
First, a court must allow withdrawal of a guilty plea if withdrawal is necessary to correct a ‘manifest injustice.’ Second, a court may allow withdrawal any time before sentencing if it is ‘fair and just’ to do so.” (citations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Isaiah Rakeem Wallace Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Assessing the validity of a plea presents a question of law that [ appellate courts] review de novo.” State v. 3 Raleigh
State of Minnesota v. Ligarius Deauntae Munn Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Victor Ciriaco-Martinez Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Raleigh , -94 (Minn. 2010) (analyzing presentencing motion under the manifest-injustice standard ).
State of Minnesota v. David Laurence Cal Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Assessing the validity of a plea presents a question of law that we review de novo.”
State of Minnesota v. Terrance James Leason Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Edward Dean Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Nathan Christopher Braun v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
Felix Kasper Piah v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Shantha Jayapathy Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Eric Thomas Grondahl Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Lonnie Har Larson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Bradley D. Fordyce v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Bradly James Haddock Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Assessing the validity of a plea presents a question of law that [ appellate courts] review de novo.”
State of Minnesota v. Richard Danell Dunston Minn. Ct. App. 2019
that occurred before [Dunston] pleaded guilty.” As to the remedy for the state’s violation of rule 9.01, we note that “[a] defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” State v. Raleigh
State of Minnesota v. Dale Dwayne Greer Minn. Ct. App. 2019
D E C I S I O N A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea, but a defendan t may challenge the va lidity of a guilty plea for the first time in a direct appeal
Preston Ryan Lee v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Markus Wilton Eskew Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
State of Minnesota v. Zane David Foley Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Malik Jordan Olsen v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Erick Lamont Lindsey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[A] court must allow withdrawal of a guilty plea if withdrawal is necessary to correct a ‘manifest injustic e.’” State v. Raleigh , (quoting Minn. R. Crim.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by