Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Raleigh, 778 N.W.2d 90.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accura te, voluntary, and intelligent.” (M inn.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A plea must be accurate to ensure that a defendant does not plead guilty “to a more serious offense than that for which he could be convicted if he insisted on his right to trial.” State v. Raleigh , 4 (Minn. 2010).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
D E C I S I O N “A defendant has no absolute right to wi thdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- Everett Savoy Vaughn, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- Teresa Michelle Peterson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
But “a court must allow withdrawal of a guilty plea if withdrawal is necessary to correct a ‘manifest injustice.’” (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accura te, voluntary, and intelligent.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
A19-1330
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Raleigh , (explaining that a defendant cannot withdraw his plea even if the district court did not obtain proper responses to establish the factual basis when the record contains enough evidence to support the conviction).
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Nyla Tomeka Murrell-French, Appellant.
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
- State of Minnesota, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Laster contends that the “district court abused its discretion by denying [his] pre - sentencing motion to withdraw his guilty plea.” “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
-
A19-1230
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
First, a court must allow withdrawal of a guilty plea if withdrawal is necessary to correct a ‘manifest injustice.’ Second, a court may allow withdrawal any time before sentencing if it is ‘fair and just’ to do so.” (citations omitted).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Assessing the validity of a plea presents a question of law that [ appellate courts] review de novo.” State v. 3 Raleigh
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Raleigh , -94 (Minn. 2010) (analyzing presentencing motion under the manifest-injustice standard ).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Assessing the validity of a plea presents a question of law that we review de novo.”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
Nathan Christopher Braun, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
- Felix Kasper Piah, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- Lonnie Har Larson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Assessing the validity of a plea presents a question of law that [ appellate courts] review de novo.”
- Bradley D. Fordyce, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
A19-0218
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
that occurred before [Dunston] pleaded guilty.” As to the remedy for the state’s violation of rule 9.01, we note that “[a] defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” State v. Raleigh
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
D E C I S I O N A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea, but a defendan t may challenge the va lidity of a guilty plea for the first time in a direct appeal
- Preston Ryan Lee, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- Malik Jordan Olsen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Erick Lamont Lindsey, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[A] court must allow withdrawal of a guilty plea if withdrawal is necessary to correct a ‘manifest injustic e.’” State v. Raleigh , (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
- Venice Felice Walker, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- Fortunato Alarcon Gatica, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- Ronnie Bila Shaka, Petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019