Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re the Welfare of J.R.B., 805 N.W.2d 895.

432 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of S. S., Custodial Parent, A. S., Stepparent, and … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. C. and J. J. A. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Jan.
A20-1307 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. H. and P. R. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Marcus Mable. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Compare (noting that we review the record “ in the light most favorable to the district court’s decision” and affirm “the district court’s findings un less they are clearly erroneous ”), with -01 (Minn. App. 2011) (noting that an argument concerning a conclusion drawn from a finding of fact in volves a mixed question of law and fact , with factual determinations subject to clear error and conclusions of law reviewed for an abuse of discretion), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. R., Mother. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: G. W., Adjudicated Father. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Wh en reviewing a decision to terminate parental rights, we review the district c ourt’s factual findings for clear error, and “we review its determination of whether a par ticular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” 01 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Jan.
A20-0743 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Competing interests of the child may include a “stable environment, health considerations[,] and the child’s preferences.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
A20-0820 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Jan.
A20-0556 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(Minn. 4 Mother makes a separate argument in her appellate brief that the evidence was insufficient to support a statutory basis for termination of her parental rights.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. A. M. and M. A. C., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[Appellate courts] review a district court’s ultimate determination that termination is in a child’s best interest for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. F., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. M. M. and K. J. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
D E C I S I O N When reviewing a decision to terminate parental rights, we review the district court’s factual findings for clear error, but “we review its determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of : B.E.M. and J.M.M., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Jan.
A20-0065 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
905 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Jan.
, A19-1884 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of E. F. O. and J. A. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In 5 re Welfare of J.R.B., review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. A. M. and R. A. L., … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A district court must balance three factors when addressing the children’s best interests: “(1) the child[ren]’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; (2) the parent’s interest in preserving the parent-child relationship; and (3) any competing interest of the child[ren].” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. R. D., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. A. F. and A. J. F., … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. A., D. M., and G. T., … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of J. R. R., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
12 ( quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S.M.K. and L.C.S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. R. H., R. W. G., and … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
with [grandmother] with the possibility of [the TPR being reversed] was not in child’s best interest.” We agree with the district court that stability is a “competing interest of the child.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. S. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Jan.
A19-0947 A19-0965 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
A19-1057 A19-1062 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In a termination proceeding, we consider whether termination of parental rights is in the children’s bests interests because the children “are the paramount consideration, and conflicts between the rights of the child and ri ghts of the parents are resolved in favor of the child.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Children of: L.N.L. and S.J.R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
On appeal from a district court’s TPR order, “we will review the district court’s findings of the underlying or basic facts for clear error, but we review its determination of whether a particular statutory basis for involuntarily terminating parental rights is present for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. M. B. and J. S. L. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-01 (Minn. App. 2011), review denied (Minn. Jan.
A19-0850 A19-0851 A19-0852 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
A19-1051 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B.-M. and A. A., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. V. M., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: N. L. B., Mother. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. R. S. and T. A. S., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Finally, this court reviews “a district court’s ultimate determination that termination is in a child’s best interest for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. B. and M. J. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: T. S. and J. G., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. A. L., N. P. C., and M. … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
r eview denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. K. H. and J. C. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K.H. and D.C., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. D. and B. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. F. P., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. W., W. F., III, V. M., and … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
We review “findings of underlying or basic facts for clear error.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. M. S. and A. M. A., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(noting that the county’s reasonable efforts included providing a psychological evaluation and that “counseling, aftercare, urinalysis, a rule 25 chemical dependen cy assessment, parenting classes and other services were available to mother”), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. L. R. and E. T.-P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. V. and S. V., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of B.C., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. M. H. a/k/a A. M. K. … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Jan.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by